Seahawks vs Ravens

Today the Seahawks finished up 35 – 6 over the Baltimore Ravens.

Thomas Rawls was tackled badly and had his leg rolled under him for an ankle injury. They kept him out of the Ravens game and we're all waiting to see when he'll be back. Hopefully next week. He walked off the field and wasn't limping. They probably wanted to be absolutely certain about him precisely because we don't want to lose him. Better to be cautious and keep him out for one game-- and a game that isn't going to be the toughest of the year-- than have the season go wrong.

It's sad that Graham is out but that was not the worst thing that could have happened. Luke Willson is talented enough to play the position without problems and Helfet makes a good stand in. However, if Rawls was really hurt that would be a very bad thing for the Seahawks season. It is wise for them to be cautious with him especially since Marshawn Lynch had to have abdominal surgery and probably won't be back soon.

They are also cautious with Russell Wilson. If the Hawks are up by thirty near the end of the fourth, they'll take him out and put Tavarez Jackson in. Wilson remains watchful and serious on the sideline, of course, unless Richard Sherman comes over and makes him laugh. Which he does. You can see Sherm's eyes crinkle up as he's trying... and trying again... and then Wilson starts to laugh.

Baldwin and Kearse were amazing and Luke Willson was also competent.

Sherm got a pick. One of the Ravens grabbed his dreadlocks and used them to throw him down. Naturally that was a penalty. You can't do that. Afterward he was joking about it with his teammates and rubbed a young assistant's shaved head, and I agree with the local announcer that it looked like was saying "If I had hair like yours, that would have been a pick-six!"

Wilson was handing out touchdown passes like they were candy. After yet another to Baldwin (turning the Sherman pick into a touchdown), Baldwin and Wilson talked on the sidelines and appeared to have a moment: Baldwin was smiling but tearing up and scrubbing his face with the side of his hand. 

One of our OsQ correspondents raised questions about whether or not Wilson's athleticism would end up hurting him the way it did RG3 and and often does other mobile quarterbacks. I am encouraged by what I saw today. The Baltimore defense was very enthusiastic about shutting down the running game today... and so Wilson only ran the ball once, when he saw a big, safe gap because the defensive end had gotten distracted by something else. In other words he did not put himself in danger just because he's used to running the ball. That would have been so easy to do, to feel pressured because Rawls was gone, to take unrealistic responsibility and take risks. But he didn't. He was patient and made excellent use of his receivers instead.  

The Good News: 

The Seahawks made a decision to play for each other and have followed through to great effect. 

The Bad News:

Various injuries including Kam Chancellor's tailbone injury. OsQ is waiting to see who will return and when.

The Question:

Will the Seahawks continue to show this excellent combination of enthusiasm, versatility and in-game wisdom?

Uniform Silliness

In the recent past the Seahawks had rain-colored uniforms with rain-colored numbers and rain-colored accents. This reflected the weather patterns of the region but it made our players seem like they were trying to literally blend into the scenery.

Since Pete Carroll took over the blue has gotten darker, the metallic pattern made the numbers look tougher and the bright green accents give the uniforms flair. Most Seattle fans probably agree that this is an improvement. This uniform still represents the region but gives the team an emphatic presence.

In the spirit of silliness, here are some observations about the different logos and uniforms across the NFL.

Ravens strike fear into the hearts of poets as they ponder “weak and weary, Over many a quaint and curious volume of forgotten lore.” However, the Baltimore Ravens’ logo is less than awe inspiring. A quirk of the eye makes the raven look concerned. “It does not look like it’s ready to fight,” said Michael Howard. Further, someone must have thought people might not get the association and added a letter B to the raven. It is not a good idea to put a letter on a logo that must reverse: the B has to turn the opposite way on the other side of the helmet, which effectively makes it two different logos.

At least they decided to use the raven for the helmet. They could have used the shield. 

The New York Giants also have letters on their helmets, but because this is the only thing on the helmet-logo, they can reverse the big, readable letters from one side to the other without the logo suffering a change. New York made a good decision in staying with the letters of their state or team name, which are more identifiable than trying to create a giant (which would defeat its own purpose on the scale of a helmet). They are a traditional team that doesn’t fuss with their uniforms so while there is a craze for retro uniforms this year, I don’t know if the Giants would get much out of switching them.

The Dallas Cowboys come from the Lone Star State. They went with silver uniforms and a big bold star on their helmets.  This logo is not artsy but Texas is more “wild west” than “artsy” anyway. The star does exactly what it is supposed to do: captures the spirit of the team for the fans and lets them know immediately which players in a scrimmage are theirs.

 

The Pittsburgh Steelers have a good-looking logo. It is historic, bold and unmistakable for that of any other team. It has the word “Steelers” on it, which is not reversible within the image, but they made the good decision to only have the logo on one side of the helmet rather than mess with the look of it.

However, in 2015 the Steelers are wearing “bumble bee” uniforms from 1934. These are a different story. Striped shirts and knee-highs are cute in themselves, but to quote L, “This is something that works and is cute in nature for a bumble bee but does not translate well to a football team.” Also the numbers look as if they are drawn on paper and then pinned to the jerseys.

The Oakland Raiders are a tough, old-school football team and their logo shows exactly that. This logo is such a busy mixture of things that it ought to be a disaster: a crest, two crossed swords, and a guy wearing both an eye-patch and an old-fashioned football helmet. As if that wasn't enough, it also has the word RAIDERS on it. However, it is so crazy that it sails all the way around and becomes amazing.

Perhaps the Miami Dolphins were trying for a similar theme with their retro 2015 uniforms but unlike the Raiders they do not get to amazing. Their dolphin is either jumping through a hoop or across the sun. For some reason the dolphin is wearing a helmet which has an M on it because while they didn’t feel the need to make the sun/hoop clear, the fact that this is Miami needed to be established beyond all doubt. To be fair to the Dolphins, their modern logo does not wear a helmet. The sun is a little clearer and there are no letters. This turns their logo from “WTF” to “oh, it’s a dolphin.”

I will also say that no one else in the NFL wears turquoise blue and orange.

The Cleveland Browns do not wear the “brownie elf,” opting instead for plain orange helmets.  This is wise.

The Browns have perhaps widest aesthetic split in their uniforms: the retro chocolate-brown uniforms might not be bright but they suit the name, look old-fashioned in a gritty "play in rain or shine" way, and are unique. The orange version is an unfortunate shade meant to be different from the Bengals. However, the two are still similar enough to be confusing in scrimmage and the Browns’ shade of red-orange somehow triggers afterimages on the television screen.

The Cincinnati Bengals’ helmets look great. The black tiger-stripes against the bright orange are striking. I must address the elephant in the room, though. Their uniforms make the huddle look like Cone-henge.

Tigers are orange and black. Ravens are purplish-black. Stars are silver. So what colors do you pick for rams? The St. Louis Rams said “to hell with it” and chose blue and gold. Their helmets are the most simple and effective in the league. Further, the gold ram-horn swirl makes the players look like they are about to lower their heads and move the chains.  Note how the shoulder accents echo the horns. 

The Cowboys’ star and the Rams’ horns are simple and effective. However, the Minnesota Vikings’ horns do not achieve the same effect. 

Why not? It’s hard to say. The star and swirl are simple 2D renderings but if anything the Vikings went too simple with their big white curve. It’s difficult sometimes to tell what the horns are. Is it a Joker smile? Venom eyes? For all their simplicity, the Viking horns are not as readily apparent as other logos.

 

The Washington Redskins logo is meant to be a stereotypical Native American. Dan Snyder resists changing it because of “tradition” but it isn’t even a great logo. Aesthetically, it has a lot of fussy details that blur into a dark blob from further away than about ten yards. If someone didn’t already know what the logo was supposed to be, they probably would not be able to tell from the stands.

The Denver Broncos made excellent use of abstract rendering with their logo. The Bronco is immediately identifiable. It looks fierce and fast, and discourages people from wanting to mess with it. Can't say I'm a fan of the orange jerseys but that color does look cool in the mane of the logo.